Sampling PLLs (SPLLs) are currently the most popular architecture for generating ultralow-jitter signals due to their high-gain sampling phase detectors (SPDs) that can significantly reduce in-band phase noise (PN). However, to maintain this advantage even in the fractional- N mode, SPLLs must remove the quantization error (Q-error) of the Δ Σ M very precisely. The use of a digital-to-time converter (DTC) before the SPD [1] (top left of Fig. 10.5.1) is a common solution, but the inherent non-linearity (NL) of the DTC, i.e., NL DTC, introduces fractional spurs and the leakage of the Q-error, which increases the inband PN. There are two approaches that are used widely to reduce NL DTC. The first approach (①) is to use a typical DTC and then compensate for NL DTC using a digital pre-distortion (DPD) that modifies the accumulated Δ Σ M code, i.e., DAQ, to have the inverse function of NL DTC [2]. However, this technique requires significant design resources (in terms of power and area) to achieve high accuracy. The second approach (②) is to design a linear DTC with an inherently small NL DTC. The constant-slope DTCs (CS-DTCs) reduced NL DTC by charging a capacitor with the same ramp rate regardless of the initial voltage determined by DAQ. The inverse constant-slope DTC (ICS-DTC) [3] further reduced NL DTC by generating the initial voltage by controlling the precharging time as a multiple of the VCO period (TVCO), i.e., k· TVCO (k is an integer), to remove the voltage dependence of the capacitor and the current. However, the downside is that a longer precharge time (or k· TVCO) is required to achieve the higher DTC resolution, which increases the thermal noise of the DTC and hence the in-band PN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: