PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 16, 2024Cureus2 citationsOpen Access

Effects of Movement Retraining and Lumbar Stabilization Exercises in Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study

View Full Paper
RDRoopa DesaiMRManisha RathiTPTushar Palekar

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Objective To determine and compare the effects of movement retraining (MR), lumbar stabilization exercises (LSE), and a combination of both these exercises on pain, flexibility, strength, and functional disability in chronic mechanical low back pain (CMLBP) patients. Materials and methods Fifteen CMLBP participants, aged 20-40 years, were randomly allocated into three groups. Group A (n=5) received MR, group B (n=5), LSE, and group C (n=5), a combination of MR and CSE, along with hot packs for eight weeks, thrice a week on alternate days. Outcomes used were the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Modified Modified Schober’s Test (MMST), Pressure Biofeedback (PBU), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and Movement Control (MC) dissociation tests to identify MC impairments and were assessed at pre-intervention, post-four weeks, and post-eight weeks. The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. The level of significance was considered at p-value<0.05. Results Participants with CMLBP significantly improved in all variables in all three groups (p-value≤0.05). On inter-group comparison, group A showed better improvement in lumbar extension range of motion than the other two groups, with a mean difference of MMST in group A of 0.62±0.30, group B of 0.52±0.22, and group C of 0.36±0.02, with a p-value ≤0.002. Group C showed more improvement in core strength, with a mean difference of 5.0±0.25 in group A, 3.2±0.56 in group B, and 5.2±0.57 in group C, with a p-value ≤0.03. A significant improvement was observed in NPRS, MMST flexion, RMDQ, and uncontrolled movements (UCMs). Conclusion All three methods of treatment are effective in the management of CMLBP. Clinically, kinetic control showed better improvement in reducing pain and improving lumbar flexion and extension range of motion. Functional disability was better improved with lumbar stabilization exercises, and core strength was improved with a combination of KC and LSE. However, a combination of MR and LSE helps improve core strength, and movement retraining improves lumbar extension.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Desai et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e78e2db6db6435876ff850https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54291
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effectiveness of Movement Control Exercise and Core Stability Exercise on Reducing Pain, Improving Range of Motion and Functional Activities in Patients with Mechanical Low Back Pain2024
  2. 2Comparing the Effectiveness of Specific Lumbar Mobilization and Core Stability Exercises in Mechanical Low Back Pain in Decreasing Pain and Disability: A Randomized Control Trial2024
  3. 3Comparing The Effect Of Lumbar Stabilization Exercise With And Without Motor Control Training On Pain And Function In Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain Among Sewing Machine Operators2025
  4. 4A205: Immediate Effects of Electrical Stimulation and Motor Control Exercise in Recurrent Low Back Pain2026
  5. 5Comparison of the Effectiveness of Maitland Spinal Mobilization Versus Mckenzie Exercise Combined with Core Stability Exercise on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Activities in Mechanical Low Back Pain2025