Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When using a ring array to perform ultrasound tomography, the most computationally intensive component of frequency-domain full waveform inversion (FWI) is the Helmholtz equation solver. The Helmholtz equation is an elliptic partial differential equation (PDE) whose discretization leads to a large system of equations; in many cases, the solution of this large system is itself the inverse problem and requires an iterative method. Our current solution relies on discretizing the 2D Helmholtz equation based on a 9-point stencil and using the resulting block tridiagonal structure to efficiently compute a block LU factorization. Conceptually, the L and U systems are equivalent to a forward and backward wave propagation along one of the spatial dimensions of the grid, resulting in a direct non-iterative solution to the Helmholtz equation based on a single forward and backward sweep. Based on this observation, the PDE representation of the Helmholtz equation is split into two one-way wave equations prior to discretization. The numerical implementations of these one-way wave equations are highly parallelizable and lend themselves favorably to accelerated GPU implementations. We consider the Fourier split-step and phase-shift-plus-interpolation (PSPI) methods from seismic imaging as numerical solutions to the one-way wave equations. We examine how each scheme affects the numerical accuracy of the final Helmholtz equation solution and present its impact on FWI with breast imaging examples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: