Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper studies Francisco Suárez's defence of the possibility of causal overdetermination. I show that, according to Suárez, the main arguments against the possibility of causal overdetermination rely on (i) a flawed conception of causal dependence and (ii) a flawed ontology of action. I argue that his objections to (i) and (ii) amount to a significant challenge to his opponents’ case against the possibility of causal overdetermination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Han Thomas Adriaenssen (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: