BACKGROUND Mobile health (mHealth) technologies have the potential to enhance cancer patient management, communication, and overall quality of life. The MyPal project, employing a participatory design approach, aims to provide palliative care support for patients with hematological malignancies through an electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) eHealth platform. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the usability and user experience of "MyPal for adults," a co-designed palliative care mobile app intended to support adult patients affected by hematologic malignancies. METHODS Representative users participated in a 4-step usability study employing a think-aloud protocol, complimented with feature satisfaction, difficulty perceived, and design impression surveys along with a short semi-structured interview. Participants were also asked to provide qualitative feedback via the post-use System Usability Scale (SUS), User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), and Post-study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). The data were analyzed along the lines of the ISO 9241-210 framework. RESULTS All participants found the intervention content useful, and they reported satisfactory usability, with a mean PSSUQ score of 2.458 and a SUS score of 68.9%. All aspects of the UEQ (Attractiveness, Perspicuity, Efficiency, Dependability, Stimulation, Novelty) surpassed usability quality benchmarks. Identified usability issues primarily related to effectiveness and efficiency as defined in ISO 9241-210. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we conducted a comprehensive usability evaluation of the MyPal for Adults app, a digital tool designed to enhance the palliative care experience. This approach identifies real-world usability issues, enabling iterative improvements in the eHealth platform's design. Our findings reveal a user-friendly interface and positive patient experiences. This study emphasizes the need to enhance palliative care mHealth platform usability, offering insights to improve palliative care for cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonotis et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: