Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
The interaction of closely-spaced footings on soils is of concern for recent decades. The inherent variability of soil makes the topic more challenging. This study investigates the behaviour of twin strip foundations on both unreinforced and geogrid-reinforced spatially random sands. The Random Finite Difference is performed by coupling Matlab and FLAC2D in each Monte Carlo simulation. Two types of sands, dense and loose, are assumed as the spatially correlated log-normal random fields and the friction angle is considered a random parameter. This study discusses how much the bearing capacity of twin footings is impressed by the heterogeneity of random sands. The unreinforced soil results show that when the uncertainty of φ is high, the homogeneous soil assumption could overestimate the interference effect by about 18% and 9% in the dense and loose sands, respectively. While soil reinforcement reduces the difference between results obtained from probabilistic analysis with those calculated with deterministic analysis. Moreover, the isotropic random fields with rapid fluctuation of φ yield the greatest interference influence in the unreinforced and reinforced dense sands. The combined impact of interference and reinforcement is greater in loose sand than in dense sand, regardless of whether the soil is heterogeneous or homogeneous.
Ghazavi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: