In the context of the ongoing climate and biodiversity crises, mixed forest stands are increasingly considered as a sustainable management alternative to monocultures. We developed a new individual-based and process-based forest growth model, PDG-Arena, to simulate mixed forest functioning and test ecophysiological interactions among trees in mixed stands. The model builds upon the validated ecophysiological stand-scale model CASTANEA and integrates tree competition for light and water. We evaluated the performance of PDG-Arena by comparing the simulated growth with annual dendrochronological growth data from 37 common beech and silver fir monospecific and mixed plots in the French Alps. PDG-Arena showed a slightly better performance than CASTANEA when simulating even-age and monospecific forests (r 2 of 32.1 versus 29.5%). When using structure-diverse and species-diverse inventories, PDG-Arena performed better than CASTANEA in pure beech (38.3 versus 22.9%) and mixed stands (40.5 versus 36.3%), but not in pure fir stands (39.8 versus 42.0%). The new model also showed a significant positive effect of species mixing on gross primary production (+5.5%), canopy absorbance (+11.1%) and transpiration (+15.8%). Our results thus show that tree-level process-based models such as PDG-Arena, formally simulating interspecific interactions, can serve as a valuable tool to understand and simulate the carbon, light and water dynamics of mixed stands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rouet et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: