Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We investigate lensing reconstruction using the clustered galaxy distribution as a source field, using both the traditional cosmic microwave background quadratic estimator and a shear-only estimator. We calculate the expected signal-to-noise ratio of the cross power spectrum of such reconstructions with cosmic shear measurements for an LSST-like galaxy survey. Modeling the galaxy field as a Gaussian random field, we find that there is substantial clustering signal in the source field at angular scales substantially smaller than those typically used by CMB reconstructions. The expected signal-to-noise for cross-correlations in LSST from cosmic shear is ~60 in the presence of shape noise, while cross correlating with a sample-variance limited mass map would have signal-to-noise in the hundreds. This type of cross-correlation could be used as a way to identify systematic errors in lensing studies and is just one example of many possible higher order correlations in galaxy surveys that may contain substantial cosmological information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Buncher et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: