In every enterprise database, administrators must define an access control policy that specifies which users have access to which assets. Access control straddles two worlds: policy (organization-level principles that define who should have access) and process (database-level primitives that actually implement the policy). Assessing and enforcing process compliance with a policy is a manual and ad-hoc task. This paper introduces a new paradigm for access control called Intent-Based Access Control for Databases (IBAC-DB). In IBAC-DB, access control policies are expressed more precisely using a novel format, the natural language access control matrix (NLACM). Database access control primitives are synthesized automatically from these NLACMs. These primitives can be used to generate new DB configurations and/or evaluate existing ones. This paper presents a reference architecture for an IBAC-DB interface, an initial implementation for PostgreSQL (which we call LLM4AC), and initial benchmarks that evaluate the accuracy and scope of such a system. We find that our chosen implementation, LLM4AC, vastly outperforms other baselines, achieving near-perfect F1 scores on our initial benchmarks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subramaniam et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: