Difference-in-differences analysis shows improved survival for cancer patients in Medicaid expansion states, indicating significant healthcare access benefits.
Medicaid expansion is associated with improvements in access to early detection and treatment services, and 2-year overall survival (OS) among individuals with cancer. However, the association with improvements in longer-term survival remains understudied. A difference-in-differences (DD) approach was used to examine changes in 5-year cause-specific survival and OS following Medicaid expansion. A total of 1,423,983 cancer cases diagnosed between 2007 and 2008 and 2014 and 2015 among adults 18 to 59 years of age residing in 26 expansion and 12 non-expansion states were included. Improvements in cause-specific survival were significantly greater in expansion states among individuals residing in rural [DD: 2.55 percentage point (ppt); 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23–4.86] and high-poverty communities (DD: 1.54 ppt; 95% CI, 0.30–2.77), non-Hispanic White individuals (DD: 0.37 ppt; 95% CI, 0.05–0.70), and those with pancreatic (DD: 2.60 ppt; 95% CI, 0.86–4.34), lung (DD: 1.32 ppt; 95% CI, 0.30–2.34), and colorectal cancers (DD: 1.31 ppt; 95% CI, 0.26–2.37). Results were similar for OS. These findings underscore the importance of Medicaid expansion in mitigating disparities in survival outcomes. Significance: Improvements in 5-year cause-specific survival and OS were greater in Medicaid expansion than non-expansion states among individuals residing in rural and high-poverty communities and among individuals diagnosed with cancers that generally have a worse prognosis, emphasizing the importance of Medicaid expansion in mitigating disparities in survival outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schafer et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: