The development of novel sub-nanometer clusters (SNCs) catalysts with superior catalytic performance depends on the precise control of clusters' atomistic sizes, shapes, and accurate deposition onto surfaces. Recent advancements in manufacturing and characterization techniques have paved the way for the production and atomic resolution characterization of transition-metal SNCs catalysts, positioning them as a promising new class of materials for this application. Nevertheless, the intrinsic complexity of the adsorption process complicates the ability to achieve an atomistic understanding of the most relevant structure-reactivity relationships hampering the rational design of novel catalytic materials. In most cases, existing computational approaches rely on just a few structures to conclude clusters' reactivity thereby neglecting the complexity of the existing energy landscapes thus leading to insufficient sampling and, most likely, unreliable predictions. Moreover, modelling of the actual experimental procedure that is responsible for the deposition of SNCs on surfaces is often not done even though in some cases this procedure may enhance the significance of certain (e.g., metastable) adsorption geometries. This study proposes a novel approach that utilizes particle swarm optimization (PSO) method, in conjunction with ab-initio calculations, to predict the most relevant SNCs structures on a surface in beam experiments, and consequently their reactivity. To illustrate the main steps of our approach, we consider the deposition of Molybdenum SNC of 6 Mo atoms on a free-standing graphene surface, as well as their catalytic properties concerning the CO molecule dissociation reaction. This study demonstrates the feasibility of the PSO technique for studying catalyst transition-metal SNCs and establishes a reliable procedure for performing theoretical rational design predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: