Only about 20% of township children in South Africa learn to read in Grade 1, and the 80% failing to read there make little progress afterwards, as indicated by the international PIRLS tests. However, in the 1990s about 80% of African children learnt to read in Grade 1. How can reading be improved again, and learners also be helped to _understand_ written English Second Language (ESL)? These questions are answered with the help of research in township classrooms regarding: • The suitability of the PHONICS APPROACH to initial reading, prescribed now, compared to the SYLLABIC APPROACH used formerly for reading African languages. • The suitability of using an untested _Lesson Plan _for ESL, a document_ _which contradicts Government’s instructions by prescribing much WRITTEN ENGLISH IN GRADE 1, confusing African children with two writing codes. • The different results of two conflicting approaches to ESL teaching: form-focussed teaching and communicative language teaching (CLT). This comparison indicates that the _Lesson Plan_ hinders the acquisition of sufficient ESL, though ESL is needed as education medium from Grade 4 onwards. It is concluded that grave injustice is done to poor children by keeping them semi-literate, so that most can only pass their grades by memorising lessons they cannot really read and understand.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martha Magdalena Cronje (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: