Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
As large language models are increasingly being used in psychological research, recent work hasstarted using language embeddings to generate and/ or evaluate psychometric scales. Building onthis work, we introduce and evaluate pseudo-item discrimination parameters, which approximateempirical measurement model parameters from natural language embeddings before anyresponse data are collected. Using two separate personality measures, the G50 and BFAS-100,and two independent datasets, we demonstrate initial internal and predictive validity for pseudoitemdiscrimination parameters. Results indicated that pseudo-discrimination estimates haveinternal convergent and discriminant validity and were also significant predictors of empiricaldiscrimination parameters for most personality subscales tested. Overall, pseudo-discriminationparameters estimated from language-embeddings appear to capture meaningful semanticinformation that explains variance in empirical item discrimination. In other words, pseudodiscriminationestimates provide an approximation of empirical measurement model parametersprior to collecting empirical data. Pseudo-discrimination estimates appear informative aboutactual item discrimination, easing the burden associated with item pool creation and calibration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guenole et al. (2024) studied this question.