Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper discusses three broad but fundamentally sound factors to consider when educators brainstorm about possible effective STEM programs to implement; namely School Climate/Teacher Attitudes, Career/Job Forecasting, and Student Motivations/Demographics. We discuss these broad factors in some detail and find that the literature identifies these factors as critical to establishing a positive framework for a supportive STEM program. While not definitive, this framework supports ongoing research to accommodate 21st-century secondary STEM programs to prepare students for careers in science and engineering.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Accuosti (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: