PulseTrendingJournal ClubResearchersJournalsExplore
Instagram
HomeTrendingJournal ClubExplore
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 9, 2025European Spine JournalOpen Access

Comparison of clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation at different segments

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

QGQi GaoYRYongxin RenXLXiangjun Lu

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective analysis compares UBED and PEID outcomes in lumbar disc herniation, indicating advantages based on anatomical variations.

Key Points

  • Both UBED and PEID resulted in significant improvement in pain levels and functional outcomes for patients with lumbar disc herniation.
  • Intraoperative metrics showed UBED incurred more blood loss and longer surgical times compared to PEID for L4/5 and L5/S1 disc herniations.
  • This retrospective study analyzed 210 patients, with follow-up exceeding six months to assess clinical outcomes and complications.
  • Findings suggest PEID is generally more efficient for L4/5 and L5/S1 herniations, while UBED is beneficial for L3/4 due to quicker surgery.

Cite This Study

Gao et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7ba40ccde5f1021f649fbhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09414-7
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share