This feasibility study demonstrates the clinical relevance and reliability of a digital self-report tool for brain injury patients, indicating its potential in neurorehabilitation.
Objectives: This study aimed to examine the clinical relevance and usability of the digital self-report version of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory – fourth edition, MPAI-4 (MPAI-4-S-dig). In its paper version, MPAI-4 is well validated for patients with acquired brain injuries (ABIs) and neurological disorders (NDs), but time consuming. An additional aim was to investigate whether MPAI-4-S-dig is reliable for repeated measurements. Setting: Community neurorehabilitation in Stockholm, Sweden. Methods: MPAI-4-S-dig was administered to 40 patients with ABI or ND 2 weeks apart. Test–retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); clinical relevance of data was assessed through Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), the Community Integration Questionnaire – Revised (CIQ-R), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: ICC values ranged from 0.86 to 0.93 for total and subscales. Significant correlations were found between MPAI-4-S-dig participation and CIQ-R Total, social integration and home integration and MoCA naming, MPAI-4-S-dig adjustment and CIQ-R Social integration, MPAI-4-S-dig Total and all subscale scores and HADS Anxiety score, MPAI-4-S-dig Total, abilities and participation and HADS Depression. Conclusion: The demonstrated reliability and clinical relevance of MPAI-4-S-dig for patients undergoing neurorehabilitation permits the implementation of digital data capture in patients with mild acquired cognitive impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gewers et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: