This article critiques conventional training models and documents how dialogical learning enhances grassroots leadership and community legitimacy.
This article explores strategies for building grassroots leadership capacity through dialogical learning, collective empowerment, and sustained community legitimacy. It critiques conventional training models that prioritize donor-driven technical skills over cultural knowledge and relational accountability. Drawing on Paulo Freire’s pedagogy of the oppressed and peer learning traditions, it argues that effective capacity-building must integrate experiential learning, reflection, and collective praxis. The discussion highlights the importance of inclusivity, addressing barriers linked to gender, class, ethnicity, and generational hierarchies. It also examines the paradox of dual legitimacy—where institutional recognition can both empower leaders and erode their local trust. Examples from women’s cooperatives, diaspora networks, and youth movements illustrate how participatory learning can reinforce both autonomy and institutional engagement. Ultimately, the article calls for leadership development frameworks that safeguard community accountability while enabling grassroots actors to engage effectively with global systems of governance and advocacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna Neya Kazanskaia (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: