PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 9, 2025Studia historiae ecclesiasticae0 citationsOpen Access

Land, Freedom, Church, and Oral History

View Full Paper
JGJulius Gathogo

Key Points

  • The article illustrates the conflict between the church and colonized citizens during Kenya's quest for freedom, spotlighting General Ndaya's actions.
  • In October 1953, the Mau-Mau rebel leader, General Ndaya, attacked a Catholic Church, exemplifying tensions in colonial Kenya.
  • Using oral history techniques, the article discusses how narratives of General Ndaya remain sidelined in national historiographies.
  • The research suggests that oral history may offer critical insights into historical events, fostering better understanding of past injustices.

Abstract

This article explores the delicate context of the 1950s, when the church was classed with the oppressor, perhaps wrongly, during Kenya’s quest for land and freedom (wiyathi na ithaka). Indeed, the antithesis of the church and its perceived engagement with the “intolerant” state in colonial Kenya is epitomised in the life of General Ndaya, the Mau-Mau rebel leader in the then-Embu District (now Kirinyaga and Embu counties). This was communicated when his soldiers attacked and shed blood in an otherwise holy ground, the Roman Catholic Church, Baricho Parish of the present-day Kirinyaga County, in October 1953. Using oral history techniques, such as storytelling, archival sources, and personal communications, among others, the research article focuses on the Kenyan freedom fighter, General Ndaya, whose historicity has failed to gain traction in the national historiographies since the 17th of October 1953, when he was killed after the Battle of River Ragati, along the Nyeri-Kirinyaga County border. In this article, the lifetimes of the pioneer Mau-Mau rebel general are used as the axis through which the concepts of land, freedom, church, and oral history are interfaced in our endeavour to understand the delicate situation where the “reign of terror” triggered the “guillotining” of the “saints.” Is oral history the right companion in our endeavour to learn from our past errors?

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Julius Gathogo (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7d631bd66d359be62673bhttps://doi.org/10.25159/2412-4265/19777
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper