This research establishes natural densities for covering numbers and abundant numbers, suggesting significant differences in their distributions.
We investigate the densities of the sets of abundant numbers and of covering numbers, integers n for which there exists a distinct covering system where every modulus divides n. We establish that the set C of covering numbers possesses a natural density d(C) and prove that 0.103230 < d(C) < 0.103398. Our approach adapts methods developed by Behrend and Deléglise for bounding the density of abundant numbers, by introducing a function $c(n)$ that measures how close an integer n is to being a covering number with the property that c(n) ≤ h(n) = σ(n)/n. However, computing d(C) to three decimal digits requires some new ideas to simplify the computations. As a byproduct of our methods, we obtain significantly improved bounds for d(A), the density of abundant numbers, namely 0.247619608 < d(A) < 0.247619658. We also show the count of primitive covering numbers up to x is O( xexp((-12√log 2 + ε)√log x log log x)), which is substantially smaller than the corresponding bound for primitive abundant numbers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McNew et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: