PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 2025Jurnal AKSI (Akuntansi dan Sistem Informasi)0 citationsOpen Access

Beneish M-Score, Audit Opinions, and Financial Manipulation: Evidence from Indonesia’s Infrastructure Sector

View Full Paper
UKUmarudin KurniawanEREksa RidwansyahLampung UniversitySASyifa Siti AuliaIndonesia University of Education

Key Points

  • Findings reveal a peak of 85% in identified manipulators in 2022, yet many received Unqualified Opinions, pointing to serious audit discrepancies.
  • The analysis utilized the Beneish M-Score model to classify companies based on financial manipulation during 2019–2023 on the Indonesia Stock Exchange.
  • Binary logistic regression identified a significant link between M-Score classifications and the audit opinions, highlighting an audit expectation gap.
  • The study stresses the necessity for improved skepticism and analytical rigor in audits, particularly in light of increasing financial manipulation incidences.

Abstract

The increasing incidence of financial statement manipulation in Indonesia has raised serious concerns regarding the credibility of audit opinions issued by independent auditors. This study investigates the extent to which audit opinions reflect indications of financial manipulation, utilizing the Beneish M-Score model as a diagnostic tool. The research focuses on infrastructure companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2019–2023 period. Employing a descriptive quantitative approach and binary logistic regression analysis, companies are classified as either manipulators or non-manipulators based on their M-Score, and subsequently compared with the audit opinions they received. Findings reveal a sharp rise in the number of companies flagged as manipulators, reaching a peak of 85% in 2022 before declining to 65% in 2023. Alarmingly, most of these identified manipulators still received Unqualified Opinions, highlighting a significant audit expectation gap. This discrepancy suggests potential weaknesses in auditors’ fraud risk assessment and underscores the urgent need for enhanced professional scepticism and analytical rigor in the audit process.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kurniawan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e861857ef2f04ca37e3b61https://doi.org/10.32486/aksi.v10i2.934
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper