In silico analysis identifies key biomechanical markers in running, suggesting a novel machine learning approach for injury risk assessment.
Hamstrings–quadriceps (H–Q) imbalance represents a biomechanical marker of knee instability and injury risk in running. This in silico study introduces a simulation-derived machine-learning framework designed to estimate H–Q imbalance using biomechanical features conceptually mappable to inertial-sensor domains. A reduced musculoskeletal framework emulating flexor–extensor balance, limb symmetry, and co-contraction patterns generated 573 synthetic running trials for 160 virtual subjects across three speeds. These interpretable features trained a calibrated gradient-boosting classifier evaluated via ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, balanced accuracy, F1, and Brier score. Across all conditions, the model achieved ROC-AUC 0.933 (95% CI 0.908–0.958), balanced accuracy 0.943, PR-AUC 0.918, F1 0.940, and Brier 0.056, outperforming a calibrated logistic baseline. Dynamic H:Q ratio and knee-moment symmetry were the dominant predictors, while co-contraction contributed complementary nuance. These results indicate that simulation-derived digital frameworks can reproduce IMU-relevant biomechanical variability, enabling interpretable machine learning for objective assessment of muscular balance in sports medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mănescu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: