This lightweight comparative study evaluates NLTK and spaCy for text classification, highlighting the trade-offs between linguistic features and semantic embeddings.
Text classification remains one of the most common NLP tasks, with applications in spam detection, sentiment analysis, and document categorization. This paper presents a lightweight comparative study of feature extraction techniques using two widely adopted NLP toolkits, NLTK and spaCy, applied to a benchmark dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. By integrating traditional linguistic features (token counts, POS tagging, stopword filtering) with semantic embeddings, we evaluate the effectiveness of each toolkit in building a baseline classification system. Experimental results provide insights into the trade-offs between linguistic preprocessing and modern vectorization methods, offering practical recommendations for small-scale text mining projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rizwan Ayazuddin (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: