Retrospective cohort analysis reveals higher acute rejection rates with early conversion to sirolimus, suggesting optimal therapeutic ranges for combined drug levels.
Background/Objectives: Combining calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) with mTOR inhibitors has been explored to reduce CNI exposure. However, the safety of this early conversion approach remains uncertain, and the optimal therapeutic targets for tacrolimus and sirolimus trough concentrations in such patients have not been clearly established. Method: In this retrospective multicenter cohort, we analyzed 8,027 kidney transplant recipients and compared a standard group (tacrolimus + MMF) with an early conversion group (MMF to sirolimus within 3 months post-transplant). To address group-size imbalance, we performed 4:1 propensity score matching, yielding a cohort of 1,180 patients. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven acute rejection between 3 and 12 months post-transplant. Results: The early conversion group had a higher acute rejection rate (7.6%) than the standard group (2.9%; p = 0.001). Stepwise threshold analysis suggested that a combined tacrolimus–sirolimus exposure (Tacro–Siro Csum) ≥11.6 ng/mL as the level associated with the lowest rejection risk, whereas levels < 8.5 ng/mL were substantially higher risk. Patients with Tacro–Siro Csum < 8.5 ng/mL showed a higher rejection rate even when CNI trough levels were adequate (p = 0.031). Tacro–Siro Csum showed the strongest inverse correlation with rejection (r = −0.33), underscoring its utility as a composite indicator. Conclusion: In early sirolimus conversion, the combined trough level of tacrolimus and sirolimus is more important than either drug alone. To reduce the risk of acute rejection, it is crucial to maintain this combined concentration at a therapeutic level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: