PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 2025The Journal of Chemical Physics2 citations

Tuning axial ligand coordination for enhanced activity and selectivity in metal–nitrogen–carbon single-atom catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction

View Full Paper
HWH.T. WangMLMingjie Liu

Key Points

  • Axial ligands significantly modify catalytic pathways in metal–nitrogen–carbon catalysts for the ORR, affecting overall efficiency.
  • Free energy analyses highlight that different metal centers (Fe, Co, Ni) exhibit distinct responses to axial ligand coordination.
  • FeN4 shows tunable activity depending on the ligand used, balancing between two electron and four electron pathways.
  • CoN4 indicates a preference for hydrogen peroxide production under specific ligand conditions, underlining its selectivity potential.

Abstract

Axial ligand coordination plays a critical role in modulating the catalytic activity and selectivity of metal–nitrogen–carbon (M–N–C) single-atom catalysts (SACs) for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). In this study, we systematically investigate FeN4, CoN4, and NiN4 active sites coordinated with a broad range of axial ligands to elucidate how ligand environments influence reaction energetics across different metal centers. Free energy analyses reveal that axial ligands can substantially modify key steps in the ORR pathway, including *OOH formation and *OH desorption, with distinct effects observed for each metal. FeN4 exhibits tunable activity and selectivity depending on the ligand, balancing between 4e− and 2e− pathways. CoN4 shows a pronounced preference toward the 2e− pathway under specific ligand environments, highlighting its potential for selective H2O2 production. In contrast, NiN4 displays generally high energy barriers and limited ORR activity across all axial ligands. These results establish a comparative framework for understanding how axial ligand coordination governs ORR performance and provide guidance for the rational design of M–N–C SACs with tailored activity and selectivity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e861b07ef2f04ca37e48c5https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0288918
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper