PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 10, 2025Frontiers in Psychology6 citationsOpen Access

The interplay between cognitive and psychological factors in subjective cognitive decline: contribution to the validation of a new screening battery

View Full Paper
MMMarina MaffoniAMAnnalisa MagnaniAPAntonia Pierobon

Key Points

  • The study reveals a significant association between depressive symptoms and subjective cognitive decline.
  • Mild depressive symptoms explained up to 10% of the variance in subjective cognitive decline measures.
  • The MASCoD screening tool shows good internal consistency and moderate-to-strong convergent validity.
  • Limitations include small sample size and the need for further validation of results in diverse populations.

Abstract

Background Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is increasingly recognized as a potential early indicator of neurodegenerative disorders, yet its heterogeneous nature and lack of standardized screening tools complicate early detection and clinical management. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize a clinical SCD population and provide a preliminary contribution to the validation of a novel multidimensional screening battery, called MASCoD (Multidimensional Assessment of Subjective Cognitive Decline). Methods A total of 59 individuals (69.36 ± 8.66, female: 71,2%) with self-reported SCD without objective cognitive impairment was recruited within two Centers for Cognitive Disorders and Dementia (CCDDs) in Northern Italy. Participants underwent a comprehensive assessment, including neurological assessment, neuropsychological testing, psychological screening, and administration of MASCoD. Convergent validity was assessed using the Cognitive Function Instrument (CFI), and internal consistency was evaluated too. Correlations between MASCoD subscales, depressive and anxious symptoms, and cognitive performance were examined, alongside comparisons between short and long forms of anxiety and depression measures (GAD and PHQ). Results The sample showed preserved cognitive performance across all domains, consistent with SCD diagnostic criteria. Mild depressive symptoms were present and significantly associated with SCD, explaining up to around 10% of the variance in SCD measures. MASCoD Section B demonstrated good internal consistency (KR-20 = 0.782) and the entire tool shows moderate-to-strong convergent validity with the CFI. Notably, comparisons between PHQ-2/GAD-2 and their full-length versions indicated the brief tools may underestimate affective symptoms in this population. Conclusion This study offers a detailed clinical and cognitive profile of an older SCD population, emphasizing the psychological dimensions of subjective complaints which should be evaluated into routine cognitive screening to proposed targeted preventive and rehabilitation interventions. The preliminary validation of MASCoD supports its potential as a reliable and multidimensional screening tool for early SCD detection. However, limitations such as small sample size, cross-sectional design, and cultural specificity necessitate further validation studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Maffoni et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e962596210319498c3004bhttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1670551
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper