Reliability generalization meta-analysis evaluates internal consistency in work reflection scales, indicating regional influences.
Positive and Negative work reflection are important constructs in the field of organizational psychology. To measure these constructs, reliable measures are needed. In order to summarize the findings from different studies, a reliability generalization meta-analysis was performed. A literature search in six databases was conducted. In total, 216 records were found, while 26 papers were included in the analysis. Positive and Negative work reflection scales by Fritz and Sonnentag (2005) and Binnewies et al. (2009) were analyzed. Analysis revealed that internal consistency varied from 0.90 to 0.93. Additionally, the region in which a study was conducted moderated part of the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tadas Vadvilavičius (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: