Case series reveals discrepancies between p16 immunohistochemistry and HPV, highlighting genomic factors.
Aims Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p16 is widely used as a surrogate marker for HPV involvement in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), among other tumours. Confirming HPV status in OPSCC is critical, as HPV‐positive tumours have better overall survival and may require de‐escalated therapy compared to HPV‐independent OPSCC in the future. However, discordance exists between p16 and HPV, and direct HPV testing is occasionally required to ensure an accurate diagnosis. The aim of this study is to highlight the genomic basis behind the limitation of relying on p16 IHC as a surrogate marker for HPV involvement. Methods and Results Through a multi‐institutional collaboration, this case series compiled four patients with a ‘false’ negative p16 staining pattern in HPV‐positive non‐keratinizing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. All cases demonstrated minimal to no p16 IHC staining and were positive for HPV by direct RNA in situ hybridization. Through CDKN2A fluorescence in situ hybridization testing, three patients demonstrated a homozygous deletion of CDKN2A and one demonstrated a heterozygous deletion. Conclusions This series highlights the genomic basis for the ‘false’ negative p16 results, raising awareness of a significant diagnostic pitfall while emphasizing the importance of careful consideration of clinicopathologic parameters in the clinical workup of these cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teich et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: