PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 11, 2025Psychological Review5 citations

Capacity not required: A long-term memory model that exhibits key signatures of working memory.

View Full Paper
SPSean M. PolynGWGeoffrey F. Woodman

Key Points

  • The model illustrates that set size effects seen in working memory are also present in long-term memory.
  • By integrating contextual dynamics, the model offers new insights into visual interference phenomena.
  • This approach prompts a re-examination of the distinctions between working and long-term memory.
  • The findings suggest that traditional measurements of working memory may not clearly distinguish from long-term memory.

Abstract

Because the study of working memory and long-term memory diverged decades ago, views about the diagnostic nature of certain measures within each literature might not be valid. For example, in the study of working memory, it is viewed as critical to show a capacity limit in storage as a way of demonstrating that one is measuring the limited-capacity working memory store and not the unlimited capacity long-term memory store. Although this is a strong logical structure, these hallmarks of working memory might already fall out of existing models of human long-term memory. Here, we show that several of the set size effects often used to validate the assumption that one is studying working memory are also observed as a natural result of the dynamics of contextual models of long-term memory storage and retrieval. Integrating contextual dynamics into a model of visual working memory provides new insight into the nature of interference in short-term visual memory tasks and allows the model to capture the temporal structure of visual experience as it unfolds in time. We discuss how the situation motivates a re-examination of unified models of human memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Polyn et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ea72339f1bd4df558cec64https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000588
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper