How can we get post-publication peer-review to happen?

Mike Taylor

doi:10.59350/908am-49898

February 20, 2021Open Access

How can we get post-publication peer-review to happen?

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The commentary evaluates the outcomes of engaging with post-publication peer-review.
Findings about vertebral pneumaticity indicate significant variability among different sauropod species.
Utilizing Qeios for publication allows for an innovative approach to peer review beyond conventional methods.
This exploration calls attention to how post-publication feedback can enhance scientific discourse and refinement.

Implication

This commentary discusses post-publication peer-review in research publishing, highlighting findings on vertebral pneumaticity in sauropods.

Abstract

Today marks the one-month anniversary of my and Matt's paper in Qeios about why vertebral pneumaticity in sauropods is so variable. (Taylor and Wedel 2021). We were intrigued to publish on this new platform that supports post-publication peer-review, partly just to see what happened. So what has happened?

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Mike Taylor (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68eb6f7ceea689731b300666 https://doi.org/10.59350/908am-49898

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

How can we get post-publication peer-review to happen?

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

How can we get post-publication peer-review to happen?

Key Points

Implication

Abstract

Discussion

Cite This Study

Keep reading

Keep reading