PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 12, 2025Journal of Surgical Oncology2 citations

Protocols, Complications, and Outcomes of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Patients With Peritoneal Metastasis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

View Full Paper
IRIan S. ReynoldsWDWilliam P. DugganNMNicholas P. McKenna

Key Points

  • PIPAC shows promising oncological outcomes, with a histological response seen in 61.8% of patients receiving the treatment.
  • Data from 1980 patients undergoing 4454 PIPAC procedures suggest that major complications and procedure-related mortality were infrequent.
  • The systematic review extracted detailed information on treatment response and safety data from multiple studies across various cancer types.
  • Quality of life remained relatively stable throughout treatment, indicating that PIPAC may offer benefits without significantly impacting patient well-being.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The use of pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is becoming more frequent for patients with unresectable peritoneal metastases. This systematic review explores the indications, protocols, feasibility, safety, oncological outcomes, patient reported outcomes and quality of life outcomes for patients being treated with PIPAC. Methods A review of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was undertaken to identify studies pertaining to patients undergoing treatment with PIPAC. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment protocols, safety data, treatment response data and outcome data were extracted from relevant studies and included in the analysis. Results Data from 1980 patients undergoing 4454 PIPAC procedures for peritoneal metastases from a range of primary cancers was extracted. The treatment protocols identified were relatively homogenous across all studies. Grade 3/4 complications, grade 3/4 toxicity and procedure related mortality occurred infrequently. At least partial histological response was seen in 61.8% of patients. Overall survival for studies presenting data for mixed primary tumors ranged from 8 to 25 months. Quality of life and function were relatively stable throughout treatment. Conclusions PIPAC is a safe and feasible treatment option for patients with peritoneal metastases. Ongoing studies are required to evaluate how it compares to best option standard of care chemotherapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Reynolds et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68eb8fe250220ac955d94b1dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/jso.70109
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1817 Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for unresectable peritoneal metastases in ovarian cancer: insights from an Indian tertiary care cancer center’s initial experience2024
  2. 2Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy for Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes2026
  3. 3Pressurised Intraperitoneal Aerosolised Chemotherapy—Results from the First Hundred Consecutive Procedures2024 · 7 citations
  4. 4Practice of using intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy under pressurization for palliative treatment of pancreatic cancer2026
  5. 5Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Feasibility, Efficacy and Safety—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2024 · 8 citations