Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis examines theft laws and legal responsibility in palm oil crimes, highlighting judicial evaluations.
The crime of Tbs. Palm oil in PT. Socfindo in the Serdang Bedagai area is a serious problem and there must be a preventive solution. The legal regulation of the crime of theft of oil palm fruit in the plantation area of PT. Socfindo Serdang Bedagai is regulated in Article 363 paragraph 1 to 4 of the Criminal Code. Theft of oil palm fruit in the area of PT. Socfindo Serdang Bedagai is included in theft under aggravating circumstances because it is carried out by two or more people together. The problem is how to regulate the crime of theft in Indonesia, how is the responsibility of the perpetrators of the crime of theft of oil palm fruit in the plantation area of PT. SOCFINDO Serdang Bedagai, what are the legal considerations of the Panel of Judges in Decision 83 / Pidana.B / 2024 / PN.Srh. This study uses a descriptive method through a normative approach (legal research), namely an approach to the problem, carried out by examining various legal aspects in terms of applicable regulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hanum et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: