PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 12, 2025Biomimetics16 citationsOpen Access

Compressive Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel Lattice Structures for Additive Manufacturing: Experimental Characterization and Numerical Modeling

View Full Paper
IRIgnacio Chirosa RíosLDLaurent DuchêneAHAnne Habraken

Key Points

  • Higher relative densities of 316L stainless steel lattices improved compressive mechanical properties significantly.
  • The study measured elastic modulus, yield strength, and energy absorption using quasi-static compression tests.
  • Finite element simulations effectively modeled the deformation behavior, correlating with experimental findings.
  • Vertical builds exhibited superior performance over horizontal builds due to fewer processing defects.

Abstract

Lattice structures produced by additive manufacturing are increasingly used in lightweight, load-bearing applications, yet their mechanical performance is strongly influenced by geometry, process parameters, and boundary conditions. This study investigates the compressive behavior of body-centered cubic (BCC) 316L stainless steel lattices fabricated by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF). Four relative densities (20%, 40%, 60%, and 80%) were achieved by varying the strut diameter, and specimens were built in both vertical and horizontal orientations. Quasi-static compression tests characterized the elastic modulus, yield strength, energy absorption, and mean force, while finite element simulations reproduced the deformation and hardening behavior. The experimental results showed a direct correlation between density and mechanical properties, with vertically built specimens performing slightly better due to reduced processing defects. Simulations quantified the effect of strut–joint rounding and the need for multi-cell configurations to closely match the experimental curves. Regardless of the boundary conditions, for a density of 20%, simulating a single cell underestimated stiffness because of unconstrained strut buckling. For higher densities and thicker struts, this sensitivity to boundary conditions strongly decreased, indicating the possibility of using a single cell for shorter simulations—a point rarely discussed in the literature. Both experiments and simulations confirmed Gibson–Ashby scaling for elastic modulus and yield strength, while the tangent modulus was highly sensitive to boundary conditions. The combined experimental and numerical results provide a framework for the reliable modeling and design of metallic lattices for energy absorption, biomedical, and lightweight structural applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ríos et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ebe3d6becc64ad52fdac83https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics10100680
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper