Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis investigates liquidity adjustments across U.S. banks, highlighting disparities in response following a regulatory regime change.
In the wake of the 2008–2009 Global Financial Crisis, the Federal Reserve began paying interest on reserves (IOR) on 1 October 2008—an intervention that, along with others, constituted a regime change for U.S. banks. In this study, we investigate whether banks’ liquidity adjustment was progressive and continuous or abrupt and regime-defining, and how adjustment timing differed across institutions. Using quarterly regulatory call reports from 2002:Q4 to 2015:Q4, we estimate a Gaussian hidden Markov model (HMM) to detect bank-specific regime shifts. We then use the inferred break dates in a regression framework that classifies banks’ liquidity behavior over time. We find a discrete upward shift in liquidity around 2008–2009 with pronounced cross-bank heterogeneity. The patterns persist when we stratify by asset size and remain highly concordant across geographic regions and primary regulators. To illustrate its broader relevance, we extend the framework to the COVID-19 era (2017–2023) for the four largest U.S. banks, showing that it captures comparable regime dynamics across successive phases of quantitative tightening and easing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sonmez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: