This methodology demonstrates the creation of an event-driven supervisory controller for the Bell 412 helicopter, highlighting its application in complex missions.
The National Research Council Canada (NRC) is actively engaged in the development of an advanced autonomy system for the Bell 412 helicopter. This system’s capabilities extend to the execution of complex missions, such as arctic resupply missions. In an arctic resupply mission, the helicopter autonomously delivers supplies to a remote arctic base. During the mission it performs tasks such as takeoff, navigation, obstacle avoidance, and precise landing at its destination, all while minimizing the need for pilot intervention. The complexity of this autonomy system necessitates the inclusion of a high-level supervisory controller. This controller plays a critical role in monitoring mission progress, interacting with system components, and efficiently allocating resources. Conventionally, supervisory controllers are embedded within monolithic programs, lacking transparent state flows. This causes system modification and testing to be a significant challenge. In our research, we present an innovative approach and methodology to develop supervisory controllers for autonomous aircraft on the example of the NRC Bell 412. Using the Discrete Event System Specification (DEVS) formalism and the Cadmium simulation engine, we effectively address the challenges above. We discuss the entire development process for a state-based, event-driven supervisory controller for autonomous rotorcraft using the NRC’s Bell-412 autonomy system as a comprehensive case study. This process includes modeling, implementation, verification, validation, testing, and deployment. It incorporates a simulation phase, in which the supervisor integrates with components within a Digital Twin of the Bell 412, and a real-time operations phase, where the supervisor becomes an integral part of the actual Bell 412 helicopter. Our method outlines the smooth transition between these phases, ensuring a seamless and efficient process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horner et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: