PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 13, 2025Maritime Technology and Research3 citationsOpen Access

Ranking barriers to green port development: A neutrosophic-fuzzy ISM approach

View Full Paper
NDNguyen Minh DucLNLan Huong Nguyen

Key Points

  • Financial availability emerged as the top barrier, scoring a truth value of 0.94, indicating urgent concern.
  • High initial cost and regulatory complexity are also significant barriers to green port implementation.
  • The study utilized a neutrosophic-fuzzy approach for more precise measurement of uncertainty in expert opinions.
  • Monte Carlo sensitivity tests indicate the stability of identified barriers, helping prioritize investments for green ports.

Abstract

Green ports represent a critical evolution in maritime logistics, transforming traditional seaports into environmentally conscious hubs that balance operational efficiency with sustainability. This study investigates the complex barriers hindering green port implementation using a hybrid neutrosophic-fuzzy Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) approach. Ten experts from port management, operations, and environmental fields gave their opinions. The study used a special neutrosophic fuzzy scale to measure unclear and uncertain expert views on 15 barriers. Results show that financial availability (FA) and high initial cost (HIC) are the biggest problems. FA scored a truth value of 0.94 and falsity of 0.06, making it the top concern. Regulatory complexity (RC) also matters, but has more uncertainty. Technical problems like lack of capacity (LTC) and technology readiness barriers (TRB) have mixed effects depending on context. Driving-dependence analysis puts FA, HIC, and RC as the main drivers, while LTC acts as a linkage barrier. Monte Carlo sensitivity tests prove the model is stable, confirming financial and regulatory barriers as priorities. This framework helps port leaders understand how barriers relate and where to invest. It supports closing the gap between green port goals and real implementation, aiming for ports that support both the economy and the environment. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------Cite this article: Duc, N. M., & Nguyen, L. H. (2026). Ranking barriers to green port development: A neutrosophic-fuzzy ISM approach. Maritime Technology and Research, 8(1), 281958. https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2026.281958 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Highlights Neutrosophic–fuzzy modeling maps green port barriers with precision. Finance, cost, and regulation consistently drive system outcomes. Technical capacity links drivers to performance, amplifying impacts. Monte Carlo sensitivity confirms stable rankings and insights. Clear actions: unlock financing, streamline permits, upskill teams.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Duc et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ec51df42911f61ef8b2031https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2026.281958
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper