This analysis explores how traditional AI handles poisoning attacks in vulnerability detection, suggesting implications for security.
The complexity of implementations and the interconnection of assorted systems and devices facilitate the emergence of vulnerabilities. Detection systems are developed to fight against this security issue, being the use of artificial intelligence (AI) a common practice. However, the use of AI is not without its problems, especially those affecting the training phase. This article tackles this issue by characterizing the resilience against poisoning attacks using a benchmark for vulnerability detection, extracting simple code features while applying traditional AI algorithms. These choices are beneficial for the fast processing of vulnerabilities required in a triage process. The study is carried out in C#, C/C++, and PHP. Results show that the vulnerability detection process is specially affected beyond 20% of false data. Remarkably, detecting some of the most frequent common weakness enumeration (CWE) is altered even with lower poison rates. Overall, K ‐nearest‐neighbor (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM) are the most resilient in C# and C/C++, while multilayer perceptron (MLP) in PHP. Indeed, vulnerability detection in PHP is less affected by attacks, while C# and C/C++ present comparable results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González‐Manzano et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: