Descriptive cross-sectional study evaluates the concordance of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in diagnosing tubal lesions, suggesting HSG's reliability for certain conditions.
Introduction: The aim of our study was to evaluate the concordance between hysterosalpingography (HSG) and laparoscopy in the diagnosis of tubal lesions at the Ebolowa Regional Hospital Centre (CHRE). Methodology: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study with an analytical component, at the CHRE from January 2022 to January 2025, including the records of patients who had undergone HSG showing a tubal lesion and benefited from operative laparoscopy for this diagnosis within 6 months. To assess concordance between the 2 procedures, the Kappa concordance coefficient (K) was used and the sensitivity and specificity, of HSG were calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and a significance threshold of p<0.05. Results: We included 140 cases. The mean age was 30.47 ± 4.86 years. A good agreement (k=0.67;95% CI 0.55-0.72) between hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in the diagnosis of bilateral proximal tubal obstruction was found with good specificity (80.5%; CI 65.5-80.2) and sensitivity (87.5%; CI 75.5-90.2). Agreement between the 2 tests was was poor for bilateral distal tubal obstruction (K=0.32; 95% CI 0.25-0.43), and a discordance in the diagnosis of mixed tubal obstruction (K=0). Conclusion: In the absence of technical and interpretation problems with HSG and laparoscopy, HSG can be a reliable examination in the diagnosis of certain tubal lesions such as bilateral proximal tubal obstruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: