This study examines two Novgorod birchbark documents, revealing details about taxes and reconstruction of the texts.
The article is dedicated to the study of two Novgorod birchbark documents from the turn of the 15th century — no. 1 and 22. Both documents were discovered in close proximity to each other (on Property A of the Nerev Excavation and the adjacent section of the street) and, as later analysis revealed, are written in the same hand. Document no. 1 is a register of in-comes from several villages, while no. 22 is a fragment of a čelobitnaja (petition). The disput-ed parts of the texts are discussed, and new conjectures are proposed for a number of lacu-nae. It was also discovered that one of the taxes (даръ) in document no. 1 had a fixed rate of 20 bely. The most significant amendments to document no. 1 are: (1) a more complete recon-struction of the first phrase of the document; (2) the localization of the landholding based on the conjecture а [с] (пе)руньского села; (3) the refinement of two reconstructions (lines 2 and 10) on the basis of the discovered regularities in the text structure and the amount of taxes. For document no. 22, the following aspects are discussed: (1) the interpretation of the disputed form öсподину; (2) the reconstruction of the first line of the inner side of the birch-bark; (3) he reading of the last preserved line.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikhail A. Sokolov (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: