PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 13, 20255 citationsOpen Access

A Unified Framework for TCR-pMHC Structural Model Assessment

View Full Paper
AAAlex Ascunce-ParísRFRoc Farriol-DuranMRMiguel Romero‐Durana

Key Points

  • AlphaFold3 outperformed other modelling tools in assessing TCR-pMHC structural models, enhancing prediction accuracy.
  • Utilizing a benchmark of 20 experimental TCR-pMHC structures, models were evaluated through various metrics including pLDDT and pDockQ.
  • A framework using random forest classifiers distinguished various quality levels of TCR-pMHC models, supporting better immunotherapy applications.
  • The approach generated a dataset of 33,820 TCR-pMHC complexes, significantly expanding accessible structural data for immunological research.

Abstract

T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of peptide-MHC complexes (pMHCs) is a central determinant of cellular immunity. Structural insights are key to understanding TCR-pMHC interactions, however progress is limited by the scarcity of experimental structures (PDB = 232 TCR-pMHC class I complexes, date 01/2025). Although protein modelling tools have rapidly advanced, their accuracy on TCR-pMHC complexes is hampered by CDR loop hypervariability, conformational flexibility, and the lack of reliable quality assessment without experimental references. To evaluate the performance of recent protein modelling algorithms on TCR-pMHC complexes, we benchmarked three general-purpose (AlphaFold3, Boltz-2, Chai-1) and two TCR-specific (tFold-TCR, TCRmodel2) modelling tools using a benchmark set of 20 experimentally determined PDB structures, demonstrating AlphaFold3 superior performance. To expand structural coverage beyond the existing experimental landscape, we present a framework that enables quality assessment of TCR-pMHC structural models without requiring experimental reference structures. To this end, we integrate multiple modelling and interface confidence metrics (pLDDT, ipTM, iPAE, pDockQ) into explainable random forest classifiers trained on 1160 models of 232 experimentally determined PDB TCR-pMHC class I complexes. This approach reliably distinguishes low-, acceptable-, medium-, and high-quality models, outperforming the combination of these metrics using literature-established thresholds. Leveraging our quality tier framework, we used AlphaFold3 to generate and evaluate the largest synthetic dataset of TCR-pMHC class I structural models to date from VDJdb-annotated sequences, comprising 33,820 complexes (169,100 models, 5 models per complex) and representing a >70-fold expansion of available structures. We demonstrate the applicability of our quality tier stratification in three settings: 1) filtering validating vs. non-validating TCR-pMHC interaction in sequence databases (VDJdb), 2) enrichment of biologically validated interactions versus synthetic negatives amongst higher quality complexes, and 3) enhancing the predictive performance of TCR-pMHC pairing models. Altogether our TCR-pMHC structural quality tier framework provides a scalable and interpretable approach for improving modelling and functional analyses of TCR-pMHC class I complexes, with translational applications in T-cell and TCR-based immunotherapies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ascunce-París et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68ecc715d1cc7436f7d18829https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.10.09.681411
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper