Comparative analysis shows an ensemble method outperforms individual classification algorithms, highlighting a robust framework.
Audio-based equipment condition monitoring suffers from a lack of standardized methodologies for algorithm selection, hindering reproducible research. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a comprehensive framework for the systematic and statistically rigorous evaluation of machine learning models. Leveraging a rich 127-feature set across time, frequency, and time-frequency domains, our methodology is validated on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Results demonstrate that an ensemble method achieves superior performance (94.2% accuracy, 0.942 F1-score), with statistical testing confirming its significant outperformance of individual algorithms by 8-15%. Ultimately, this work provides a validated benchmarking protocol and practical guidelines for selecting robust monitoring solutions in industrial settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pillai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: