Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
User-initiated comments enhance the timeliness of fact-checking, indicating a promising approach to reduce misinformation.
Community-based fact-checking is promising to reduce the spread of misleading posts at scale. However, its effectiveness can be undermined by the delays in fact-check delivery. Notably, user-initiated organic comments often contain debunking information and have the potential to help mitigate this limitation. Here, we investigate the feasibility of synthesizing comments to generate timely high-quality fact-checks. To this end, we analyze over 2.2 million replies on X and introduce Commenotes, a two-phase framework that filters and synthesizes comments to facilitate fact-check delivery. Our framework reveals that fact-checking comments appear early and sufficiently: 99.3% of misleading posts receive debunking comments within the initial two hours since post publication, with synthesized commenotes successfully earning user trust for 85.8% of those posts. Additionally, a user study (N=144) found that the synthesized commenotes were often preferred, with the best-performing model achieving a 70.1% win rate over human notes and being rated as significantly more helpful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: