Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study compares slow-release fertilizers derived from biosolids and mineral fertilizers, showing FOMI's enhanced fertilizer-use efficiency.
In this study, a slow-release fertilizer (SRF) was obtained by occluding NPK 10–10–10 into two matrices and compared with the uncoated mineral fertilizer (F). The first matrix, FOMI, used biosolids/paper sludge at 3:1 (w/w); the second, FOMII, used biosolids/clay at 1:1 (w/w). Materials and pellets were physiochemically and microbiologically characterized. Release kinetics were evaluated in water and in soil columns packed with acid-washed sand; matrix-only controls and sand blanks confirmed negligible background N, P, and K. The uncoated mineral fertilizer (F) showed a rapid burst, whereas occlusion slowed release. FOMII reduced release relative to F, and FOMI produced the slowest, controlled profiles: kinetic fits yielded lower k values for FOMI than for FOMII and F. FOMI also exhibited higher water-retention capacity (WRC) and cation-exchange capacity (CEC), consistent with its greater organic-matter content. In soil, FOMI released less than 15% at 48 h and no more than 75% at 30 d, meeting European Committee for Standardization (CEN) SRF criteria; FOMII released faster than FOMI but slower than F, which exceeded 90% within the test period. Therefore, FOMI is a biodegradable, low-cost SRF that improves fertilizer-use efficiency while returning organic matter to agricultural soils; FOMII shows intermediate yet beneficial performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palacios et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: