Framework integrates machine learning and TCAD simulations for accurate p-n junction modeling, suggesting improved predictive performance.
Abstract We present a comprehensive framework for p-n junction simulation that bridges analytical models, numerical methods, and machine learning approaches. A hybrid finite-difference–Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) solver is developed and validated across 12 silicon devices with doping concentrations ranging from 1015 to 1019 cm−3. The surrogate model reproduces Sentaurus TCAD results with 0.48% RMS potential error while revealing that analytical models systematically underestimate the built-in potential by up to 8 mV at high doping concentrations. This error leads to a 3% overestimation of solar-cell short-circuit current in predictive models. The framework achieves a 47× speed-up compared to conventional TCAD simulations and is successfully extended to 2D geometries (50 × 50 mesh) without architectural modifications, maintaining 0.62% RMS error with 12× acceleration. All implementation code, datasets, and reproduction scripts are openly available under an MIT license.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petrosyan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: