Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Questionnaire-based study reveals knowledge gaps and training barriers in endodontists and general practitioners.
Aim - To evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding use of Electronic Apex Locators (EALs) among dentists in Nagpur city. Methodology- A self-administered web-based closed-ended questionnaire was conducted among dentists in Nagpur city. The participants comprised a total of 263 Dental Professionals, including General Dental Practitioners (GDPs) and Endodontists. The survey assessed their preferred methods for working length determination, training in its use, availability of EALs, perceived benets, accuracy, and barriers to adoption of EALs. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. A total of 263 dental practitioners partic Results - ipated, including 113 endodontists and 150 GDPs. It was found that EALs were the most preferred method for working length determination, with higher usage among endodontists compared to GDPs. Most participants reported receiving adequate EAL training, with slightly higher proportions among endodontists compared to GDPs. More endodontists had access to EALs than GDPs, and they found it vital and more accurate in Root Canal Treatments. Among factors inuencing EAL use, GDPs focused more on cost and training barriers, while endodontists focused on clinical efciency. Despite this, the majority of participants recommended EALs to colleagues, with endodontists showing higher support compared to GDPs. EALs are preferred Conclusionby many dental professionals to determine working length due to their accuracy. While some GDPs recognize the benets of EALs, their adoption is restricted by cost, training gaps, and maintenance concerns. Continued education and improved accessibility may enhance their use in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ukey et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: