Descriptive survey shows that communication formality influences resistance to organizational change, suggesting improved trust through structured methods.
Effective communication is central to the success of organizational change, particularly within public institutions characterized by bureaucratic structures and political complexities. This study examined the influence of formality in communication strategies on resistance to organizational change in the Taita Taveta County Government, Kenya, guided by the Uncertainty Reduction Theory (URT). The research was motivated by persistent resistance to reforms in Kenya’s devolved governance systems, where unclear and inconsistent communication often leads to employee mistrust, policy delays, and project failures. Using a descriptive survey design and a convergent mixed-methods approach, the study integrated both quantitative and qualitative data to provide a comprehensive understanding of how structured communication impacts change acceptance. The target population comprised 3,500 county employees, from which 346 respondents were sampled through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews and analyzed using SPSS version 27 for quantitative analysis and NVivo for qualitative insights.The findings revealed a strong and statistically significant negative relationship between formality in communication strategies and resistance to organizational change (R = 0.742, R² = 0.551, β = -0.742, p < 0.001). This implies that 55.1% of the variation in resistance was explained by communication formality. Structured, official, and hierarchical communication enhanced clarity, built trust, and reduced ambiguity among employees, thereby lowering resistance levels. Descriptive results showed that formal communication reduced uncertainty (M = 4.01) and promoted consistent use of official channels (M = 3.85), though excessive rigidity (M = 2.45) occasionally alienated employees. The study confirmed the URT’s proposition that clear and reliable communication mitigates psychological anxiety during change. The study concluded that formal communication practices significantly enhance organizational adaptability when balanced with empathy and inclusivity. It recommended that the Taita Taveta County Government institutionalise standardised communication systems, integrate participatory feedback mechanisms, and train leaders on empathetic yet authoritative messaging. Moreover, it suggested the adoption of ICT-based communication tools to improve accessibility and transparency. This study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on change management in devolved public sectors, demonstrating that effective communication is not merely procedural but strategic in building trust and reducing resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mwakuduwa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: