PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 15, 2025Annual Review of Law and Social Science2 citationsOpen Access

Indigenous Peoples and Land Claiming in Latin America

View Full Paper
TSTatiana Alfonso SierraALAna Braconnier De LeónRSRachel Sieder

Key Points

  • Transformative outcomes for indigenous land rights litigation can significantly alter social structures and injustices.
  • Judicialized claims by indigenous peoples in Latin America highlight unique features of land rights litigation compared to other socioeconomic rights.
  • The current scholarly framework inadequately addresses the specificities of indigenous peoples' access to judicial processes for land claiming.
  • Increased attention to indigenous land rights litigation can inform policy changes and promote greater social justice in Latin America.

Abstract

Inequalities in ownership, distribution, and access to land generate social injustice in many contexts, yet land rights litigation has not been central to the literature on socioeconomic rights, courts, and social transformation. What is specific about land litigation? Is there any feature—in processes of judicialization or their outcomes—that renders land conflicts distinct? We address these questions by analyzing Indigenous Peoples’ (IP) judicialized claims for land and territory in Latin America, arguing that existing scholarship on the prospects for social transformation through the courts does not adequately address their specificities. Putting the literature on the judicialization of socioeconomic rights in Latin America in discussion with research on judicialized IP land and territorial claims in the region, we propose an analytical frame for assessing when court rulings of IP land rights litigation can be considered transformative.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sierra et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68f01110f081da0584b5682ehttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-061824-080800
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper