This research demonstrates the impact of cognitive dissonance on negative word-of-mouth among Generation Z, suggesting strategies to manage their anti-recommendation behaviors.
Currently, digital consumption has become mainstream, and social e-commerce platforms are increasingly important. As the leading consumer demographic, Gen Z relies heavily on online word-of-mouth, where the phenomenon of "anti-recommendation" is common. Negative word of mouth is particularly prominent, giving rise to active searches for "pitfall avoidance" and "bad reviews" to verify authenticity and assess risk. Within the ISMAS (Interest-Search-Mouth-Action-Share) model framework, this reflects a decision-altering pathway where Interest triggers Mouth (verification), leading to Action blockage. This study reveals the anti-marketing logic of Generation Z in word-of-mouth management on social e-commerce platforms, and optimizes the ISMAS model to provide risk-hedging strategies for enterprises. Questionnaire and SPSS analysis show that negative word-of-mouth and cognitive dissonance significantly affect purchase intention, but active seeking of negative word-of-mouth represents high cognitive cost, triggered less than low-cognitive emotional validation. Thus, platform managers and merchants need to improve through constructing dynamic IWOM (Internet Word of Mouth) governance, reconfiguring advertisement dissemination, and optimizing algorithmic architecture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei Wu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: