Numerical simulations show how Reynolds number and aspect ratio affect scalar transport in prolate spheroids, suggesting new insights into fluid dynamics.
Using high-fidelity numerical simulations based on a lattice Boltzmann framework, the advection-enhanced transport of a passive scalar from a prolate spheroid in simple shear flow has been thoroughly investigated across various parameters, including the spheroid’s aspect ratio, particle-to-fluid density ratio, Reynolds number (defined as Re=GR²/ν , where G is the flow shear rate, R is the radius of a sphere of the same volume as the spheroid and ν is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid) and Schmidt number (defined as Sc=ν /D , where D is the diffusivity of passive scalar transport). The Reynolds number is constrained to the range of 0 ≤ Re ≤ 1, where the prolate spheroid tumbles around its minor axis, aligned with the vorticity axis, in an equilibrium state. Several key findings have emerged: (i) particle inertia significantly influences the uniformity of the spheroid’s tumbling, affecting flow patterns around the spheroid and, consequently, the modes of scalar transport; (ii) both uniform and non-uniform tumbling generate a scalar line in the fluid with elevated scalar concentration, which sweeps through the wake region and merges with clusters of previously formed scalar lines; (iii) fluid passing over the spheroid carries the passive scalar downstream along these scalar lines; (iv) variations in the uniformity of spheroid tumbling result in distinct flow patterns and scalar transport modes, leading to different transport rates; (v) within the studied parameter ranges, increased particle inertia enhances the scalar transport rate; (vi) when particle inertia is minimal, the dimensionless scalar transport rate for different aspect ratios converges to a common dependence on the Péclet number. These phenomena are analysed in detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: