This review examines CAR-T therapy efficacy and adverse effects in hematological malignancies, highlighting challenges such as durability and tumor microenvironment issues.
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematological malignancies by reprogramming a patient's T cells to target tumor-specific antigens. Despite great success in clinical care, challenges such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), neurotoxicity, and limited efficacy in solid tumors remain. Recent advances in CAR-T engineering-including dual-targeted CARs, armored CARs with cytokine-secreting capabilities, and safety switches-have enhanced tumor specificity, reduced off-target effects and improved durability. However, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) in solid tumors remains a key obstacle that affects the infiltration, activation, and long-term function of CAR-T cells. This review systematically analyzes the clinical translation of CAR-T therapies, focusing on their mechanism of action, efficacy in hematological and solid tumors, and management of adverse effects. We highlight the efficacy and toxicity profiles of CAR-T and summarize relevant emerging strategies such as CAR T cell therapy in combination with other immunotherapies such as checkpoint inhibitors. Our findings emphasize that CAR-T therapies are transitioning from a salvage option to a first-line contender for hematologic cancers, but their broader application will need to address durability and safety trade-offs. Future research should prioritize multifunctional CAR designs, predictive biomarkers of toxicity, and personalized manufacturing protocols to expand its accessibility. Overcoming these challenges will make CAR-T more dominant in solid and refractory cancers and bring hope to more cancer patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan Wang (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: