Cross-sectional study shows link between social support, self-efficacy in heart failure patients, indicating importance for treatment programs.
Abstract Background: Heart failure is of major health challenges requiring long-term management. The current study pursed the goal to discover the relationship between perceived social support with self-efficacy and health-promoting behaviors in patients hospitalized in cardiac care units. Method: The present cross-sectional analytical study was conducted on 193 patients with heart failure (EF≤35, NYHA class I/II) participating in the study in Shiraz-based ValiAsr in Fasa and Al-Zahra Hospitals in 2024 using a convenient sampling method. The data were collected with three standard questionnaires: Sullivan Cardiac Self-Efficacy Scale (α=0.93), Cheraghi’s Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) (α=0.87), and Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile(HPLP-II) (α=0.86). The data were analyzed via SPSS-26 using descriptive statistics (frequency, mean, and standard deviation) and inferential test (Pearson). Results: As the results divulged, perceived social support was significantly associated with self-efficacy and health-promoting behaviors in heart failure suffering patients (P<0.001). The highest correlation was reported between emotional support and self-efficacy (r=0.9) and also between instrumental support and stress management at the dimensional level (r=0.558). Discussion and Conclusion: According to the findings, the patients who had higher levels of social support outperformed in disease management and adherence to health behaviors. Social support plays a key role in building up self-efficacy and enhancing health-promoting behaviors in heart failure sufferers. The results highlighted the importance of considering support systems in the treatment and care programs of such patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Montazeri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: